In re Lusine Hakhverdyan

What the court wrote

Verbatim from the court's document (public domain). Ellipses mark omitted text; nothing is paraphrased.

21 3. FRCP 60(b)(4) – Orders Void for Lack of Jurisdiction 22 23 Under FRCP 60(b)(4), a judgement or order may be set aside as void for lack of 24 2 25 In these motions, Debtor occasionally refers to inaccurate or nonexistent case citations. For example, in the First Relief Motion, Debtor cites “Whittaker v. Otto, 2014 WL 37845 (9th Cir.),” with the description “Counsel lacks Probation and Parole, 83 A.3d 293 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania 2014), which does not discuss the 27 authority of counsel. Also in the First Relief Motion, Debtor cites to “In re Chionis, 531 B.R. 52 (coercive litigation threats violate bankruptcy protection.)” Chionis is not in 531 B.R. 52; it is an unpublished decision of the Ninth 28 Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel which can be found at In re Chionis, 2013 WL 6840485 (9th Cir. BAP December 27, 2013) (concerning action for violation of discharge injunction; this decision is inapposite to Debtor’s FRCP 60 Motions). -16-

Authorities cited in the passage: Whittaker v. Otto, 2014 WL 37845 (9th Cir.) · In re Chionis, 531 B.R. 52 · Whittaker v. Otto, 2014 WL 37845 · B.R. 52