James Jordan v. USA, Clinicas Del Camino Real, Inc., et al.

What the court wrote

Verbatim from the court's document (public domain). Ellipses mark omitted text; nothing is paraphrased.

provides direct quotations to several cases. (Reply 6–7, Dkt. No. 14.) For example, Jordan provides this quote from City of Chicago v. International College of Surgeons, 522 U.S. 156, 172–73 (1997): “When the federal claim is eliminated early in the litigation, the district court must decline jurisdiction over the remaining state-law claims.”4 (Opp’n 6.) However, this quote does not exist in Chicago. Moreover, the legal proposition for which Jordan cites it is also plainly incorrect. See 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c) (providing that district courts have discretion to decline jurisdiction over remaining state-law claims after dismissing “claims over which they have original jurisdiction”). More concerning is Jordan’s apparently fake citation. Jordan cites to Nevada Power Co. v. Monsanto Co., 151 F.3d 1201, 1205 (9th Cir. 1998). (Opp’n 2.) However, the reporter and pincite leads to McKeon v. United States, 151 F.3d 1201 (9th Cir. 1998), not Nevada Power, which is found at 955 F.2d 1304 (9th Cir. 1992). The scourge of AI-hallucinated case law is well-documented and the Court need not beat a dead horse. The Court takes this opportunity only to note that, as other courts around this country have