Juan Villalovos-Gutierrez, et al. v. Gerard Van de Pol, et al. (2)

What the court wrote

Verbatim from the court's document (public domain). Ellipses mark omitted text; nothing is paraphrased.

20 respond to the troubling assertion that defendant has produced improperly redacted records. 21 Defendant also cites cases purportedly from this district that do not exist, 1 even though defendant 22 was issued a prior warning in this case that doing so is a potential ground for sanctions. (See ECF 23 No. 29 at 5-6.) 24 The undersigned reserves ruling on the request for attorney fees for plaintiffs’ initial 25 motion to compel, subject to plaintiffs filing a properly noticed and supported motion for 26 1 These case citations provided by defendant, and possibly others, are inaccurate and/or the cases 27 do not exist: Brown v. Johnson, No. 1:06-cv-01068, 2009 WL 1788406 (E.D. Cal. June 23, 2009); Watkins v. Cal. Dep’t of Corr. & Rehab., No. 1:08-cv-01530, 2012 WL 1906523, at *1 28 (E.D. Cal. May 25, 2012). (See ECF No. 36 at 13.) 4 Case 2:24-cv-02305-DJC-CKD Document 39 Filed 02/24/26 Page 5 of 5 1 sanctions with evidence to substantiate the request. In addition, defendant and/or defendant’s

Authorities cited in the passage: Brown v. Johnson, No. 1:06-cv-01068, 2009 WL 1788406 · Watkins v. Cal. Dep’t of Corr. & Rehab., No. 1:08-cv-01530, 2012 WL 1906523