Arno Kuigoua v. Adam Michael Sacks

What the court wrote

Verbatim from the court's document (public domain). Ellipses mark omitted text; nothing is paraphrased.

motions for reconsideration are reviewable as part of this appeal. (Ibid.) All further unattributed statutory references are to the Code of Civil Procedure. 2 The settlement agreement was referenced as “Exhibit A” to respondent's opposition but was not attached to the opposition. Instead, a note read, “Redacted due to confidentiality clause will release by court order as necessary.” 3 As respondent points out, appellant has cited three apparently nonexistent or miscited cases in his opening brief. While this court is permitted to impose sanctions for relying on nonexistent legal authority (Noland v. Land of the Free, L.P. (2025) 114 Cal.App.5th 426, 436), we decline to do so as appellant's opening brief was otherwise comprehensible. However, we caution appellant that any subsequent cases containing miscites will likely result in sanctions. Government Works.

Authorities cited in the passage: s opening brief identified by respondent and noted by the court. || Fabricated: Case Law | Third apparently nonexistent or miscited case citation in appellant · Noland v. Land of the Free