Zena L. Powell v. The Borough of Bergenfield

What the court wrote

Verbatim from the court's document (public domain). Ellipses mark omitted text; nothing is paraphrased.

But Powell does not make any allegations regarding her plans to return to Bergenfield, including the definiteness of her plan to return and the frequency of traveling there. Therefore, the Court will GRANT Defendant’s Motion and DISMISS Plaintiffs claim for injunctive relief as pled. D. Plaintiff’s Apparent Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence Finally, when reviewing Plaintiff’s Opposition, the Court, like Defendants, identified several inaccurate quotations and citations. Namely, Plaintiffincludes quotations from real cases, but the quotations are fabricated. Defendants list numerous examples. See Reply at 2-3. The presence of fabricated quotations in a brief is a sign that the brief’s author may have used generative artificial intelligence (“GAI”). Pursuant to Section I(B) of the Undersigned’s Judicial Preferences, if a party uses GAI in any court filings, they must include a mandatory disclosure that: “(1) identifies the GAI program: (2) identifies the portionofthe filing drafted by the GAI;