Skip to content

Courts on AI / Fabricated or misquoted citations

Innocent v. Meraki Installers, LLC

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District · State appellate courts · FL · · No. 4D2025-1151 · order

On 2026-05-27, in Innocent v. Meraki Installers, LLC, District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District affirmed and referred counsel to the Florida Bar over trial-transcript quotations not found in the record. Counsel filed an initial brief using record or transcript quotations not found in the record, quotations that did not appear in the.

Disposition
The court affirmed and referred counsel to the Florida Bar over trial-transcript quotations not found in the record.
Recorded conduct
Counsel filed an initial brief using record or transcript quotations not found in the record, quotations that did not appear in the cited source, and multiple nonexistent or hallucinated authorities. — outcome: referral; actor: lawyer
Canonical record
Incident tracker entry — verified outcome, regulator disposition and related rules

What the court wrote

Verbatim from the court's document (public domain). Ellipses mark omitted text; nothing is paraphrased.

We write briefly, however, to address concerns regarding multiple quotations from the trial transcript contained in Appellant’s initial brief that do not appear to be found anywhere in the actual trial transcript or otherwise in the Record. In consideration of the arguments made on this point in the parties’ briefs, as well as during oral argument, we refer this matter to the Florida Bar for appropriate action. See Eclectic Synergy, LLC v. Seredin, et al., No. 4D26- 0781 (Fla. 4th DCA May 27, 2026) (citing Russell v. Mells, 426 So. 3d 913, 920 (Fla. 2d DCA 2025) (“When a lawyer cites imaginary legal authorities to our court as if they were law, we are compelled to refer that lawyer to the Bar because of the professional rules of conduct.”); Fla. Code of Jud. Conduct, Canon 3D(2) (“A judge who receives information or has actual knowledge that substantial likelihood exists that a lawyer has committed a violation of the Rules Regulating The Florida Bar shall take appropriate action.”); R. Regulating Fla.

Authorities cited in the passage: LLC v. Seredin · Russell v. Mells, 426 So

compiled by the Cognesio LLP editorial teammethodas of 2026-09-07v0.1.1coding CC BY 4.0JSON Hugging Face GitHub