Courts on AI / Fabricated or misquoted citations
State v. Presti
Intermediate Court of Appeals of Hawaiʻi · State appellate courts · HI · · No. CAAP-24-0000826 · opinion
The Hawaiʻi Intermediate Court of Appeals affirms a criminal judgment while documenting numerous nonexistent or misidentified cases in Cody Presti’s self-represented opening brief. The court explains sanction authority for fake citations but declines to apply civil Rule 11 procedures in the direct criminal appeal.
- Disposition
- The court affirmed the judgment and declined to sanction the self-represented criminal appellant for nonexistent citations.
- Recorded conduct
- Self-represented appellant cited 95 cases; 11 were unlocatable and six had citations leading to different cases, including State v. Alves, State v. Bonds, and State v. Pune. — outcome: warning; actor: litigant in person
- Canonical record
- Incident tracker entry — verified outcome, regulator disposition and related rules
What the court wrote
Verbatim from the court's document (public domain). Ellipses mark omitted text; nothing is paraphrased.
We pause to note that Presti's Opening Brief is just the next example of the alarming rise of citations to fake cases by attorneys and self-represented litigants in this jurisdiction and nationally. See Stewart Yerton, AI in the Courtroom? Complaints About Misuse by Hawaiʻi Lawyers Growing, Honolulu Civ. Beat (July 30, 2025) ...; see generally AI Hallucination Cases, Damien Charlotin, https://www.damiencharlotin.com/hallucinations/ ... (aggregating AI hallucination cases internationally). This court has recently sanctioned attorneys and self-represented appellants in civil cases for citing nonexistent authority...
Authorities cited in the passage: State v. Alves · State v. Pokini, 45 Haw. 295, 367 P.2d 499 (1961) · State v. Bonds · Jackson v. DeWitt, 592 N.W.2d 262 (Wis. Ct. App. 1999) · State v. Pune · State v. Branch, 636 P.2d 421 (Or. Ct. App. 1981)