Gregory J. Van Etten v. Stephanie K. Fattman, et al.

What the court wrote

Verbatim from the court's document (public domain). Ellipses mark omitted text; nothing is paraphrased.

[ECF No. 139 at 2]. This objection reflects a fundamental misunderstanding of the statutory framework governing reports and recommendations and is without merit. 1 Under 28 U.S.C. § 1 It appears to the Court that Plaintiff relies on generative AI to make statements of law. However, the Court warns Plaintiff that generative AI does not necessarily generate accurate findings of law, can create incorrect or made-up citations, and should not be relied upon without review as a source 5 Case 4:24-cv-40113-MRG Document 149 Filed 03/06/26 Page 6 of 19 636(b)(1)(B) (“§ 636”), a district judge may refer dispositive matters, including motions to dismiss, to a magistrate judge for a report and recommendation, regardless of the parties’ consent Id.; see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(1) (discussing magistrates judges’ ability to issue R&R’s “without

Authorities cited in the passage: s use of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) to support the incorrect proposition that a magistrate · Fed. R. Civ. P. 72 · Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(1)