Courts on AI / Fabricated or misquoted citations
Euphoric, LLC v. Westport Community Improvement District
United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri · Federal district courts · MO · · No. 4:25-cv-00023 · order
On 2026-06-03, in Euphoric, LLC et al. v. Westport Community Improvement District, et al, the Western District of Missouri admonished the filer to verify authorities before presenting AI-assisted or otherwise unsupported legal citations. Counsel filed a motion using quotations that did not appear in the cited source, nonexistent or hallucinated authorities, and authorities used for propositions they did not support.
- Disposition
- The court ruled on numerous dismissal and amendment issues and admonished plaintiffs’ counsel about inaccurate and misleading citations.
- Recorded conduct
- Plaintiffs’ briefs included incorrect case numbers, Westlaw citations, dates, and misleading uses of real cases, including authorities identifiable only by case name. The court did not find bad faith but admonished counsel about citation duties. — outcome: warning; actor: lawyer
- Canonical record
- Incident tracker entry — verified outcome, regulator disposition and related rules
What the court wrote
Verbatim from the court's document (public domain). Ellipses mark omitted text; nothing is paraphrased.
whatever the root cause for these inaccuracies and errors (including any use of legal or non-legal generative AI tools, for example), the professional duty and responsibility of counsel ... requires that careful and proper attention to detail is provided
Authorities cited in the passage: DePeralta v. Dlorah · Doss v. Epic Healthcare Mgmt. Co., 901 S