Courts on AI / Fabricated or misquoted citations
Turgeon v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire · Federal district courts · NH · · No. 1:25-cv-00510-SM-TSM · order
The District of New Hampshire affirms bankruptcy dismissal and recounts that the bankruptcy court struck Noella Turgeon’s objection because it contained false, hallucinated case citations. The order rejects Turgeon’s due-process challenge, noting the bankruptcy court warned her about misleading filings and gave leave to amend.
- Disposition
- The district court affirmed dismissal of Turgeon's Chapter 13 petition and upheld striking her objection.
- Recorded conduct
- Self-represented debtor filed an objection containing false, hallucinated case citations that the bankruptcy court found inaccurate and misleading. — outcome: other; actor: litigant in person
- Canonical record
- Incident tracker entry — verified outcome, regulator disposition and related rules
What the court wrote
Verbatim from the court's document (public domain). Ellipses mark omitted text; nothing is paraphrased.
The court then questioned Turgeon regarding her Objection to the Trustee’s motion to dismiss. Specifically, the court asked Turgeon about her use of “false, hallucinated case citations” within her brief. The bankruptcy court explained to Turgeon that the citations she referenced and relied upon in her objection were inaccurate and misleading. Accordingly, her objection to the motion to dismiss would be stricken. Turgeon protested that she had been trying to act in “good faith.” The court responded: “it’s not going well for you because items are not getting noticed, []proper forms are not getting used, and you’re misleading the Court. So I really strongly urge you to get an attorney in this case and to go that route. If you continue to proceed pro se, we’ll continue to monitor the case accordingly.”