In the Matter of the Application of Jonathan David Rinaldi

What the court wrote

Verbatim from the court's document (public domain). Ellipses mark omitted text; nothing is paraphrased.

This Court notes that upon review of the petition, petitioner's citations were either for New York cases that were general election law matters and inapplicable to the facts in this case, or to nonexistent case law. Respondent's argument that the case law petitioner presented was AI hallucinations and fabricated has some merit, but since respondent did not seek sanctions, there is no reason for this Court to render a ruling on this argument. Finally,petitionerarguesrespondent,anincumbentAssembly Member, should be fully familiar with the election law and should have checked to see if his party affiliation had been changed prior to filing the certificate of authorization. He further argues challenging candidates, such as himself, are routinely removed from the electoral process due to ministerial errors that render petitions facially deficient.