Courts on AI / Fabricated or misquoted citations

Moore v. Wireless CCTV LLC

United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas · Federal district courts · TX · 2026-04-27 · No. 4:25-cv-05476 · memorandum opinion

Fabricated or misquoted citations

The Southern District of Texas on 2026-04-27 warned the self-represented party to verify legal authorities and cautioned that future hallucinated or nonexistent citations may bring sanctions in Moore v. Wireless CCTV LLC. The self-represented party filed a pleading with two fabricated case citations, including Thomas v. City of San Marcos.

Disposition: The court warned the self-represented party to verify legal authorities and cautioned that future hallucinated or nonexistent citations may bring sanctions.
Recorded conduct: The self-represented party filed a pleading with two fabricated case citations, including Thomas v. City of San Marcos and Cole v. Sandler. — outcome: warning; actor: litigant in person
Canonical record: Incident tracker entry — verified outcome, regulator disposition and related rules

What the court wrote

Verbatim from the court's document (public domain). Ellipses mark omitted text; nothing is paraphrased.

14, 2020). private cause of action; that claim is dismissed, with prejudice, because amendment would be futile. Moore has one final opportunity to amend and must do so no later than May 15, 2026. 8 SIGNED on April 27, 2026, at Houston, Texas. ________________________________ Lee H. Rosenthal Senior United States District Judge Wireless also asserts that Moore’s pleadings indicate the use of generative AI and point out cases she cites that do not exist. (Docket Entry No. 10 at 20). The court has checked those citations (see, e. g. , Docket Entry No. 7 at 2 (citing “Thomas v. City of San Marcos (W. D.

Authorities cited in the passage: Thomas v. City of San Marcos · Pleading cited 'Thomas v. City of San Marcos · Pleading cited 'Cole v. Sandler, 2014 WL 266501 (E.D. La.)' · Cole v. Hunter

Court document: damiencharlotin.com
Read: 2026-09-07 · court document read from a public mirror; official copy pendingprovisional
Found via: charlotin-cc0
Notes: official copy pending

United States court documents are public domain; the topic coding, disposition line and summary are SafeLegalAI's reading of the document for comparison, not a finding about any person named in it. This record summarises a public court document or official publication and reports what it says; SafeLegalAI makes no findings of its own. Individuals and organisations are named only as they appear in that public record. Anyone named may send a right of reply, correction or contextual update (for example an appeal, vacatur or later disposition) via /report; we add a dated note where appropriate. Reply or correct this record.

compiled by the Cognesio LLP editorial teammethodas of 2026-09-07v0.1.1coding CC BY 4.0JSON Hugging Face GitHub