Justice-sector AI / China / Supreme People's Court
Opinions on AI application in judicial fields 2022-12-12
status as stated: required to develop Internal policy Not specified
The Supreme People's Court English site says Chinese courts were required to develop a competent AI system by 2025 and that AI results may serve as supplemental references while rulings must remain with judges.
rulings must always be made by judges Status date given by the source: 2022-12-12.
Official record english.court.gov.cn Read 2026-09-07 · primary document readFound via user brief, web search Notes Official English Supreme People’s Court page; quoted-short applied. Quotation ≤25 words for identification; the page is linked. The status word is the source's own on the read date; a pilot is not recorded as a deployment and a contract is not recorded as use. This record summarises a public court document or official publication and reports what it says; SafeLegalAI makes no findings of its own. Individuals and organisations are named only as they appear in that public record. Anyone named may send a right of reply, correction or contextual update (for example an appeal, vacatur or later disposition) via /report; we add a dated note where appropriate. Reply or correct this record .
compiled by the Cognesio LLP editorial team method as of 2026-09-07 v0.1.1 coding CC BY 4.0 JSON
Disclaimer · Last checked 2026-09-07
SafeLegalAI is a research publication by Cognesio LLP, not a law firm. Nothing here is legal advice, and no lawyer–client relationship arises from reading it. Rules change; always check the official document linked on each record and take advice on your own situation.
Researched and drafted with AI assistance; verified against primary sources and edited by Cognesio LLP. The linked official documents are the record — our summaries are not the law and are not legal advice. Full disclaimer → · Something wrong? Report it →
Supreme People's Court · Court · 
Hugging Face