Justice-sector AI / Netherlands / Raad voor Rechtsbijstand
Steekproeftrekker Raad voor Rechtsbijstand · Legal aid body · 2009-01
status as stated: In gebruik Use-case inventory entry Analytics
The Dutch Algorithm Register lists Raad voor Rechtsbijstand's Steekproeftrekker with status "In gebruik". The public entry describes an algorithm used to draw samples for after-the-fact checks of automatically granted legal-aid applications or declarations. The register gives the start or publication date as 2009-01.
"Als een advocaat/mediator gesubsidieerde rechtsbijstand aanvraagt voor een burger, moet dit onderbouwd worden met documenten. Om het proces sneller te laten verlopen,…" Status date given by the source: 2009-01.
Official record algoritmes.overheid.nl Read 2026-09-07 · primary document readFound via Official Dutch Algorithm Register API Notes The register copyright page says website text may be reused unless a specific item states restrictions; details were read through the official API. Open licence — see notes. The status word is the source's own on the read date; a pilot is not recorded as a deployment and a contract is not recorded as use. This record summarises a public court document or official publication and reports what it says; SafeLegalAI makes no findings of its own. Individuals and organisations are named only as they appear in that public record. Anyone named may send a right of reply, correction or contextual update (for example an appeal, vacatur or later disposition) via /report; we add a dated note where appropriate. Reply or correct this record .
compiled by the Cognesio LLP editorial team method as of 2026-09-07 v0.1.1 coding CC BY 4.0 JSON Hugging Face GitHub
Disclaimer · Last checked 2026-09-07
SafeLegalAI is a research publication by Cognesio LLP, not a law firm. Nothing here is legal advice, and no lawyer–client relationship arises from reading it. Rules change; always check the official document linked on each record and take advice on your own situation.
Researched and drafted with AI assistance; verified against primary sources and edited by Cognesio LLP. The linked official documents are the record — our summaries are not the law and are not legal advice. Full disclaimer → · Something wrong? Report it →