Justice-sector AI / United States / Connecticut Judicial Branch
JBAPPM Policy 1013 Artificial Intelligence Responsible Use Framework Connecticut Judicial Branch · Connecticut · Judiciary · 2024-02-01
status as stated: Responsible AI Framework Internal policy Not specified
Connecticut Judicial Branch’s Responsible AI Framework applies to AI software, hardware, services and appliances used by employees, affiliates, contractors and vendors. It sets guardrails for ethical use, fairness, privacy, transparency, accountability, security, assessment and procurement.
This policy applies to AI software, hardware, services, and appliances. Official record jud.ct.gov Read 2026-09-07 · primary document readFound via connecticut-judicial-branch-ai-page Facts recorded from a state or local government page; quotation ≤25 words. The status word is the source's own on the read date; a pilot is not recorded as a deployment and a contract is not recorded as use. This record summarises a public court document or official publication and reports what it says; SafeLegalAI makes no findings of its own. Individuals and organisations are named only as they appear in that public record. Anyone named may send a right of reply, correction or contextual update (for example an appeal, vacatur or later disposition) via /report; we add a dated note where appropriate. Reply or correct this record .
compiled by the Cognesio LLP editorial team method as of 2026-09-07 v0.1.1 coding CC BY 4.0 JSON Hugging Face GitHub
Disclaimer · Last checked 2026-09-07
SafeLegalAI is a research publication by Cognesio LLP, not a law firm. Nothing here is legal advice, and no lawyer–client relationship arises from reading it. Rules change; always check the official document linked on each record and take advice on your own situation.
Researched and drafted with AI assistance; verified against primary sources and edited by Cognesio LLP. The linked official documents are the record — our summaries are not the law and are not legal advice. Full disclaimer → · Something wrong? Report it →