Justice-sector AI / United States / U.S. Department of Justice — Executive Office for United States Attorneys
Critical Mention U.S. Department of Justice — Executive Office for United States Attorneys · Prosecution service · 2025
status as stated: Deployed Use-case inventory entry Generative AI Critical Mention
The DOJ 2025 inventory lists Critical Mention for U.S. Department of Justice — Executive Office for United States Attorneys. The row states the stage as Deployed; it classifies the use case as Generative AI for Law Enforcement and says it addresses Identification of public data
Identification of public data Status date given by the source: 01/2025.
Official record justice.gov · archived copy Read 2026-09-07 · primary document readFound via doj-inventory-2025 Notes DOJ spreadsheet row DOJ-0116; original component field: Department of Justice / EOUSA. United States federal record — public domain (17 U.S.C. §105). The status word is the source's own on the read date; a pilot is not recorded as a deployment and a contract is not recorded as use. This record summarises a public court document or official publication and reports what it says; SafeLegalAI makes no findings of its own. Individuals and organisations are named only as they appear in that public record. Anyone named may send a right of reply, correction or contextual update (for example an appeal, vacatur or later disposition) via /report; we add a dated note where appropriate. Reply or correct this record .
compiled by the Cognesio LLP editorial team method as of 2026-09-07 v0.1.1 coding CC BY 4.0 JSON Hugging Face GitHub
Disclaimer · Last checked 2026-09-07
SafeLegalAI is a research publication by Cognesio LLP, not a law firm. Nothing here is legal advice, and no lawyer–client relationship arises from reading it. Rules change; always check the official document linked on each record and take advice on your own situation.
Researched and drafted with AI assistance; verified against primary sources and edited by Cognesio LLP. The linked official documents are the record — our summaries are not the law and are not legal advice. Full disclaimer → · Something wrong? Report it →