Skip to content

Regulation Tracker / EU AI Act / Chapter V · Section 3

Article 55
Obligations of providers of general-purpose AI models with systemic risk

Chapter V — Classification of general-purpose AI models as general-purpose AI models with systemic risk, Section 3 — Obligations of providers of general-purpose AI models with systemic risk. 5 distinct duties, powers or definitions are coded from this article, applying from 2025-08-02.

official text: EUR-Lex (consolidated 27 Jul 2026) · text © European Union (Decision 2011/833/EU) · coding CC BY 4.0 · data: obligations.json · Hugging Face · GitHub

The text

1. In addition to the obligations listed in Articles 53 and 54, providers of general-purpose AI models with systemic risk shall:

  1. (a)perform model evaluation in accordance with standardised protocols and tools reflecting the state of the art, including conducting and documenting adversarial testing of the model with a view to identifying and mitigating systemic risks;
  2. (b)assess and mitigate possible systemic risks at Union level, including their sources, that may stem from the development, the placing on the market, or the use of general-purpose AI models with systemic risk;
  3. (c)keep track of, document, and report, without undue delay, to the AI Office and, as appropriate, to national competent authorities, relevant information about serious incidents and possible corrective measures to address them;
  4. (d)ensure an adequate level of cybersecurity protection for the general-purpose AI model with systemic risk and the physical infrastructure of the model.

2. Providers of general-purpose AI models with systemic risk may rely on codes of practice within the meaning of Article 56 to demonstrate compliance with the obligations set out in paragraph 1 of this Article, until a harmonised standard is published. Compliance with European harmonised standards grants providers the presumption of conformity to the extent that those standards cover those obligations. Providers of general-purpose AI models with systemic risks who do not adhere to an approved code of practice or do not comply with a European harmonised standard shall demonstrate alternative adequate means of compliance for assessment by the Commission.

3. Any information or documentation obtained pursuant to this Article, including trade secrets, shall be treated in accordance with the confidentiality obligations set out in Article 78.

What it requires, coded

SafeLegalAI's reading of each duty in this article: who, what, from when, under which fine tier, and whether it reaches a firm, chambers, court or legal-AI vendor. Descriptive, not advice; the quoted words are the Regulation's.

  1. Art. 55(1) (a)Risk managementGPAI with systemic risk

    Providers of GPAI models with systemic risk must perform model evaluation using state-of-the-art standardised protocols and tools, including documented adversarial testing to identify and mitigate systemic risks.

    "perform model evaluation in accordance with standardised protocols and tools reflecting the state of the art, including conducting and documenting adversarial testing of the model with a view to identifying and mitigating systemic risks;"
    Who
    GPAI provider (systemic risk)
    From
    (Art. 113(b))
    Fine tier
    Art. 101
    Legal practice
    Reaches legal-AI vendors or public bodies — Medium for vendors building legal-AI products on foundation models or providing general-purpose AI models.
  2. Art. 55(1) (b)Risk managementGPAI with systemic risk

    Providers of GPAI models with systemic risk must assess and mitigate possible Union-level systemic risks and their sources from development, market placement or use of the model.

    "assess and mitigate possible systemic risks at Union level, including their sources, that may stem from the development, the placing on the market, or the use of general-purpose AI models with systemic risk;"
    Who
    GPAI provider (systemic risk)
    From
    (Art. 113(b))
    Fine tier
    Art. 101
    Legal practice
    Reaches legal-AI vendors or public bodies — Medium for vendors building legal-AI products on foundation models or providing general-purpose AI models.
  3. Art. 55(1) (c)Incident reportingGPAI with systemic risk

    Providers of GPAI models with systemic risk must track, document and report serious incidents and possible corrective measures without undue delay to the AI Office and, where appropriate, national competent authorities.

    "keep track of, document, and report, without undue delay, to the AI Office and, as appropriate, to national competent authorities, relevant information about serious incidents and possible corrective measures to address them;"
    Who
    GPAI provider (systemic risk)
    From
    (Art. 113(b))
    Fine tier
    Art. 101
    Legal practice
    Reaches legal-AI vendors or public bodies — Medium for vendors building legal-AI products on foundation models or providing general-purpose AI models.
  4. Art. 55(1) (d)RequirementGPAI with systemic risk

    Providers of GPAI models with systemic risk must ensure adequate cybersecurity protection for the model and its physical infrastructure.

    "ensure an adequate level of cybersecurity protection for the general-purpose AI model with systemic risk and the physical infrastructure of the model."
    Who
    GPAI provider (systemic risk)
    From
    (Art. 113(b))
    Fine tier
    Art. 101
    Legal practice
    Reaches legal-AI vendors or public bodies — Medium for vendors building legal-AI products on foundation models or providing general-purpose AI models.
  5. Art. 55(2)DocumentationGPAI with systemic risk

    Providers of systemic-risk GPAI models may rely on codes of practice or harmonised standards to demonstrate compliance, and must demonstrate alternative adequate means if not using them; information obtained is confidential.

    "Providers of general-purpose AI models with systemic risk may rely on codes of practice within the meaning of Article 56 to demonstrate compliance with the obligations set out in paragraph 1 of this Article, until a harmonised standard is published. Compliance with European harmonised standards grants providers the presumption of conformity to"
    Who
    GPAI provider (systemic risk)
    From
    (Art. 113(b))
    Fine tier
    Art. 101
    Legal practice
    Reaches legal-AI vendors or public bodies — Medium for vendors building legal-AI products on foundation models or providing general-purpose AI models.
    See
    Art. 56 · Art. 78

Cite

Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, Article 55 (Obligations of providers of general-purpose AI models with systemic risk), as amended by Regulation (EU) 2026/1744, consolidated text of 27 July 2026, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/2026-07-27/eng#art_55 — text © European Union; only the Official Journal is authentic. Coding: SafeLegalAI (published by Cognesio LLP), "EU AI Act, structured", safelegalai.com/regulation/eu-ai-act/article-55, accessed 2026-09-08, CC BY 4.0.