Skip to content

Regulation Tracker / EU AI Act / Chapter IX · Section 3

Article 81
Union safeguard procedure

Chapter IX — Post-market monitoring by providers and post-market monitoring plan for high-risk AI systems, Section 3 — Market surveillance and control of AI systems in the Union market. 3 distinct duties, powers or definitions are coded from this article, applying from 2026-08-02.

official text: EUR-Lex (consolidated 27 Jul 2026) · text © European Union (Decision 2011/833/EU) · coding CC BY 4.0 · data: obligations.json · Hugging Face · GitHub

The text

1. Where, within three months of receipt of the notification referred to in Article 79(5), or within 30 days in the case of non-compliance with the prohibition of the AI practices referred to in Article 5, objections are raised by the market surveillance authority of a Member State to a measure taken by another market surveillance authority, or where the Commission considers the measure to be contrary to Union law, the Commission shall without undue delay enter into consultation with the market surveillance authority of the relevant Member State and the operator or operators, and shall evaluate the national measure. On the basis of the results of that evaluation, the Commission shall, within six months, or within 60 days in the case of non-compliance with the prohibition of the AI practices referred to in Article 5, starting from the notification referred to in Article 79(5), decide whether the national measure is justified and shall notify its decision to the market surveillance authority of the Member State concerned. The Commission shall also inform all other market surveillance authorities of its decision.

2. Where the Commission considers the measure taken by the relevant Member State to be justified, all Member States shall ensure that they take appropriate restrictive measures in respect of the AI system concerned, such as requiring the withdrawal of the AI system from their market without undue delay, and shall inform the Commission accordingly. Where the Commission considers the national measure to be unjustified, the Member State concerned shall withdraw the measure and shall inform the Commission accordingly.

3. Where the national measure is considered justified and the non-compliance of the AI system is attributed to shortcomings in the harmonised standards or common specifications referred to in Articles 40 and 41 of this Regulation, the Commission shall apply the procedure provided for in Article 11 of Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012.

What it requires, coded

SafeLegalAI's reading of each duty in this article: who, what, from when, under which fine tier, and whether it reaches a firm, chambers, court or legal-AI vendor. Descriptive, not advice; the quoted words are the Regulation's.

  1. Art. 81(1)Enforcement powerNot tier-specific

    When objections are raised or the Commission considers a national measure contrary to Union law, the Commission must consult, evaluate and decide whether the measure is justified within the applicable deadline.

    "the Commission shall without undue delay enter into consultation with the market surveillance authority of the relevant Member State and the operator or operators, and shall evaluate the national measure"
    Who
    Commission
    From
    (Art. 113 second subparagraph)
    Legal practice
    Reaches legal-AI vendors or public bodies — This can determine Union-wide treatment of measures against legal-AI systems.
    See
    Art. 79(5) · Art. 5
  2. Art. 81(2)Enforcement powerNot tier-specific

    If the Commission finds a national measure justified, all Member States must take appropriate restrictive measures; if unjustified, the Member State must withdraw it.

    "all Member States shall ensure that they take appropriate restrictive measures in respect of the AI system concerned"
    Who
    Member State
    From
    (Art. 113 second subparagraph)
    Legal practice
    Reaches legal-AI vendors or public bodies — A justified safeguard decision could restrict a legal-AI system across Member States.
    See
    Art. 79
  3. Art. 81(3)Cooperation with authoritiesNot tier-specific

    If justified non-compliance is due to harmonised standard or common specification shortcomings, the Commission must use the Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012 procedure.

    "the Commission shall apply the procedure provided for in Article 11 of Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012"
    Who
    Commission
    From
    (Art. 113 second subparagraph)
    Legal practice
    Institutional — This concerns standards governance rather than a direct legal-practice obligation.
    See
    Art. 40 · Art. 41 · Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012

Cite

Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, Article 81 (Union safeguard procedure), as amended by Regulation (EU) 2026/1744, consolidated text of 27 July 2026, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/2026-07-27/eng#art_81 — text © European Union; only the Official Journal is authentic. Coding: SafeLegalAI (published by Cognesio LLP), "EU AI Act, structured", safelegalai.com/regulation/eu-ai-act/article-81, accessed 2026-09-08, CC BY 4.0.