Skip to content

Legal Tech / Compare / Contract review & due diligence

Checkbox First Pass and ThoughtRiver: documented facts, side by side

What Checkbox Software, Inc. and ThoughtRiver Ltd publish on their own pages about pricing, training on customer data, retention, certifications, data residency, contract terms, accuracy evidence and incidents on the record, as of 2026-09-21. Every cell links to the page that states it. Where a vendor publishes nothing, the cell says so — the absence is the fact. This is a record, not a ranking, review or recommendation.

as of 2026-09-21 · records: Checkbox First Pass · ThoughtRiver · tools.json (CC BY 4.0) · method: how tool records are compiled · audit rows: Checkbox First Pass · ThoughtRiver

Documented factCheckbox First PassCheckbox Software, Inc. · checked 2026-09-16ThoughtRiverThoughtRiver Ltd · checked 2026-09-03
Product
CategoryContract review & due diligence · legal front door, contract review, invoice review, legal request triageContract review & due diligence · pre-signature contract review, risk scoring, Word add-in
Built forIn-house legalIn-house legal, Mid-sized firms
Model providers disclosedown, third-partysourceThoughtRiver own LLMsource
MarketsUS, UK, AUSTRALIA, SINGAPOREUK
Pricing
Price publishedno price publishedsourceper-seat · Enterprise from £30,000; Professional from £15,000source
Seat minimumnot disclosednot disclosed
Minimum termnot disclosednot disclosed
Free trialnot disclosedsourcedocumented yessource
Data
No training on customer datadocumented yessourcedocumented nosource
Zero retention with model providersnot disclosedsourcenot disclosedsource
Data residency optionsCustomer-requested regionsourceUKsource
Private deploymentnot disclosedsourcenot disclosedsource
Encryption at restdocumented yessourcedocumented yessource
Certifications
SOC 2documented yessourcenot disclosedsource
ISO 27001documented yessourcedocumented yessource
ISO 42001not disclosedsourcenot disclosedsource
HIPAAnot disclosedsourcenot disclosedsource
Contract
DPA offereddocumented yessourcedocumented yessource
Sub-processor list publishednot discloseddocumented yessource
SSO / SAMLnot disclosedsourcedocumented yessource
Breach notification windownot disclosednot disclosed
Terms last updatednot disclosednot disclosed
Privacy policy last updatednot disclosednot disclosed
Record
Accuracy evidence publishednone published0 third-party · 1 vendor-runsource
Incidents on the recordnone recordednone recorded
Documentation last audited2026-09-162026-09-06

documented yes documented no not disclosed on the pages we read

Cite this comparison

SafeLegalAI Legal Tech Tools, "Checkbox First Pass and ThoughtRiver: documented facts", safelegalai.com/tools/compare/checkbox-first-pass-vs-thoughtriver (accessed 2026-09-21). Data: CC BY 4.0. Facts are recorded from the vendors' published pages on the dates shown; vendors may correct a record via /report.

SafeLegalAI is a research publication by Cognesio LLP, not a law firm. Nothing here is legal advice, and no lawyer–client relationship arises from reading it. Rules change; always check the official document linked on each record and take advice on your own situation. Researched and drafted with AI assistance; verified against primary sources and edited by Cognesio LLP. The linked official documents are the record — our summaries are not the law and are not legal advice. SafeLegalAI is published by Cognesio LLP, which also builds LegalAI Space (a Cognesio LLP product); LegalAI Space is listed in the directory with a permanent ownership label and is never compared, scored or counted here. Ownership policy.

Vendor, product, court and regulator names and logos are the property of their respective owners and are used solely to identify the product, body or document referred to; SafeLegalAI claims no rights in them. SafeLegalAI is not affiliated with, endorsed by, sponsored by or approved by any listed vendor, except where a record is labelled an affiliated product. Facts are recorded from vendors' published pages on the date shown; "not disclosed" means not found on the pages read, not that the vendor lacks it. No ranking, rating, review, recommendation or warranty is implied. Mark owners who prefer a text-only reference, and vendors seeking a correction, may write to the report page. Trade mark and quotation policy.