Skip to content

Incident Tracker / United States (state)

Barber v. Morawa

·Michigan Court of Appeals·US-STATERegulatory referralprovisional

The Michigan Court of Appeals affirms denial of Joyce Barber’s new-trial motion but sanctions her counsel for AI-related citation failures. The court holds that repeated fabricated and unsupported authorities violated Michigan court rules, remands to determine defendant’s actual damages and expenses, and refers counsel for possible investigation.

Court
Michigan Court of Appeals
Date
2026-06-17
Who used the AI
Lawyer
AI tool
Not identified in the record
Conduct
Plaintiff’s counsel cited fabricated authority in a protective-order motion, again in a new-trial motion, and again in the appellate brief; a notice of correction prepared with AI still contained unsupported substitutes. The court remanded for damages and forwarded the opinion to the Attorney Grievance Commission.
Outcome
Regulatory referral
Penalty
No monetary penalty recorded
Regulatory outcome
No separate regulatory disposition recorded
Status
Provisional — written by the court-decisions pipeline, awaiting the editor
Last checked
2026-09-07

Primary sources for this incident

Related regulation records for this incident

No related regulation record has been linked to this incident yet.

Similar incidents on the record

Cite this record

SafeLegalAI Global Legal AI Incident Tracker, “Barber v. Morawa”, safelegalai.com/tracker/barber-v-morawa (accessed 2026-10-07). Data: CC BY 4.0.

Report an issue with this record →