Skip to content

Incident Tracker / United States (state)

Boatner v. Hickerson

·Missouri Court of Appeals·US-STATESanctionsprovisional

On 2026-06-02, in Boatner v. Hickerson, Missouri Court of Appeals imposed a $10,000 monetary sanction for the defective legal authorities. A self-represented appellant cited Davis v. Bess even though the court found the authority did not exist. The monetary component was $10,000.

Court
Missouri Court of Appeals
Date
2026-06-02
Who used the AI
Litigant in person
AI tool
GAI
Conduct
A self-represented appellant cited Davis v. Bess even though the court found the authority did not exist.
Outcome
Sanctions
Penalty
US$10,000
Regulatory outcome
No separate regulatory disposition recorded
Status
Provisional — written by the court-decisions pipeline, awaiting the editor
Last checked
2026-09-07

Primary sources for this incident

Related regulation records for this incident

No related regulation record has been linked to this incident yet.

Similar incidents on the record

  • Varma v. The Bank of New York Mellon, No. E085566 (Cal. Ct. App.)2026-08-27 · California Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District, Division Two · SanctionsThe California Court of Appeal sanctioned self-represented appellants in Varma after their opening brief used nonexistent cases, false quotations and unsupported propositions the court attributed to generative AI hallma…
  • State v. Presti, No. CAAP-24-0000826 (Haw. Ct. App.)2026-08-31 · Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · WarningOn a Hawaii criminal appeal, self-represented appellant Cody Presti filed an opening brief citing 95 cases, 11 of which the court could not locate; six citations pointed to unrelated decisions. The Intermediate Court of…
  • Noble v. WMC Mortgage Corp., 2026 IL App (1st) 251168-U2026-08-28 · Appellate Court of Illinois, First District · WarningIn Illinois, self-represented litigant Sanja Noble's mortgage appeal brief included a hallucinated citation to Ferguson v. Georges for the standard of review. The Appellate Court found the citation actually led to Peopl…
  • Salloum v. Department of Transportation, No. 25CA1748 (Colo. App.)2026-08-27 · Colorado Court of Appeals · WarningIn Colorado, self-represented appellant Ayman Salloum filed an opening brief citing three authorities the Court of Appeals could not verify, including one dated in the future. Applying Al-Hamim's warning on generative-A…

Cite this record

SafeLegalAI Global Legal AI Incident Tracker, “Boatner v. Hickerson”, safelegalai.com/tracker/boatner-v-hickerson (accessed 2026-09-08). Data: CC BY 4.0.

Report an issue with this record →