Skip to content

Incident Tracker / United States (state)

Rodriguez v. Rodriguez

·Sixth District Court of Appeal, State of Florida·US-STATEPendingprovisional

The Florida District Court of Appeal, Sixth District on 2026-04-10 ordered counsel to show cause why sanctions or corrective action should not issue for the defective authorities in Bruno Roberto Rodriguez v. Kathryn Louise Rodriguez. Counsel filed a brief with one fabricated case citation and one mischaracterized case citation.

Court
Sixth District Court of Appeal, State of Florida
Date
2026-04-10
Who used the AI
Lawyer
AI tool
Not identified in the record
Conduct
Attorney Karin Gerardin filed a certiorari petition and reply that cited non-existent cases and cited actual cases for inaccurate legal propositions; the court said the filings bore the hallmarks of generative-AI assistance without sufficient guardrails.
Outcome
Pending
Penalty
No monetary penalty recorded
Regulatory outcome
No separate regulatory disposition recorded
Status
Provisional — written by the court-decisions pipeline, awaiting the editor
Last checked
2026-09-08

Primary sources for this incident

Related regulation records for this incident

No related regulation record has been linked to this incident yet.

Similar incidents on the record

  • Lisandrillo v. Palozzi, No. 4D2026-2262 (Fla. 4th DCA)2026-09-16 · District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District · PendingIn Florida's Fourth District Court of Appeal, petitioner's counsel Jaclyn R. Soroka filed an emergency writ petition and related filings the court suspected contained AI-generated components, including convoluted false…
  • Kid International, LLC v. City National Bank of Florida, No. 4D2025-2599 (Fla. 4th DCA 2026)2026-10-07 · District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District · SanctionsIn Florida's Fourth District Court of Appeal, counsel for Kid International filed an AI-assisted brief citing a hallucinated case seven times and fabricated quotations from real authorities. The court affirmed on the me…
  • Cervantes v. Bianco, No. S295866 (Cal. Sept. 24, 2026)2026-09-24 · Supreme Court of California · Regulatory referralIn California, the state Supreme Court disapproved the improper use of AI tools in the Riverside County sheriff's briefing in a ballot-seizure writ case, after the law firm misquoted Common Cause v. Board of Supervisors…
  • State ex rel. Schnell v. Richardson, No. ED114731 (Mo. Ct. App.)2026-09-08 · Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District · SanctionsIn the Missouri Court of Appeals, relator's counsel Jenna Rohr Conley admitted using generative AI to research a mandamus petition and failing to verify two cases that did not exist. The court denied the writ and impose…

Cite this record

SafeLegalAI Global Legal AI Incident Tracker, “Rodriguez v. Rodriguez”, safelegalai.com/tracker/bruno-roberto-rodriguez-v-kathryn-louise-rodriguez (accessed 2026-10-07). Data: CC BY 4.0.

Report an issue with this record →