Incident Tracker / United States (state)
Carol L. Williams v. Tracy Honl
·Oregon Court of Appeals·US-STATECosts orderprovisional
The Oregon Court of Appeals on 2026-04-22 struck the brief, awarded $8,044 in costs, and allowed appellant to file a replacement brief by a fixed deadline in Carol L. Williams v. Tracy Honl. Counsel filed an opening brief with one fabricated case citation, one false case quotation, and three mischaracterized case citations, including Tubra v. Cooke.
- Court
- Oregon Court of Appeals
- Date
- 2026-04-22
- Who used the AI
- Lawyer
- AI tool
- Not identified in the record
- Conduct
- Counsel filed an opening brief with one fabricated case citation, one false case quotation, and three mischaracterized case citations, including Tubra v. Cooke and Neumann v. Liles.
- Outcome
- Costs order
- Penalty
- US$8,044
- Regulatory outcome
- No separate regulatory disposition recorded
- Status
- Provisional — written by the court-decisions pipeline, awaiting the editor
- Last checked
- 2026-09-07
Primary sources for this incident
Related regulation records for this incident
No related regulation record has been linked to this incident yet.
Similar incidents on the record
- Douglas v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co., No. 24-CV-1099 (D.C. Ct. App.)2026-09-03 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Regulatory referralIn the District of Columbia Court of Appeals, Deutsche Bank's appellee brief cited four nonexistent authorities after counsel used Google's generative AI search tool without verification. The court struck the brief, ref…
- Kiser v. DeSimone Auto Group, No. 2428 EDA 2025 (Pa. Super. Ct.)2026-08-27 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · WarningIn Pennsylvania, counsel for Paige and Ty Kiser cited a non-existent Superior Court decision, Com. v. Reid, for an appellate issue in a consumer dispute. The Superior Court called the authority counterfeit, suggested ch…
- Benjamin v. State, No. 2189 Sept. Term 2024 (Md. App. Ct.)2026-08-25 · Appellate Court of Maryland · WarningIn Maryland, appellate counsel filed a criminal brief with multiple inaccurate citations. The Appellate Court compared the problem to Mezu, said fake AI-generated cases are improper, accepted counsel's corrective effort…
- LPC Commercial Services, LLC v. Ar-Razzaaq Properties, LLC, Record No. 1407-25-4 (Va. Ct. App.)2026-08-25 · Court of Appeals of Virginia · SanctionsIn Virginia, appellee's counsel in LPC Commercial Services filed a brief with 25 phantom quotations attributed to Virginia cases, which the Court of Appeals attributed to unchecked computer-assisted research. The court…
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Global Legal AI Incident Tracker, “Carol L. Williams v. Tracy Honl”, safelegalai.com/tracker/carol-l-williams-v-tracy-honl (accessed 2026-09-08). Data: CC BY 4.0.