Skip to content

Incident Tracker / United States (state)

Donaghy v. Zoning Bd. of Review of the Town of North Kingstown

·Rhode Island Superior Court·US-STATEOtherprovisional

Rhode Island Superior Court on 2026-03-12 found counsel's appellate brief contained two citation defects, including Smithfield v. Fanning and Duffy v. Milder, involving nonexistent authorities, fabricated or misattributed quotations. The court remanded the zoning appeal to the board for a continued public hearing and cautioned counsel about likely AI-generated citations.

Court
Rhode Island Superior Court
Date
2026-03-12
Who used the AI
Lawyer
AI tool
Not identified in the record
Conduct
Counsel's appellate brief contained two citation defects, including Smithfield v. Fanning and Duffy v. Milder, involving nonexistent authorities, fabricated or misattributed quotations.
Outcome
Other
Penalty
No monetary penalty recorded
Regulatory outcome
No separate regulatory disposition recorded
Status
Provisional — written by the court-decisions pipeline, awaiting the editor
Last checked
2026-09-07

Primary sources for this incident

Related regulation records for this incident

No related regulation record has been linked to this incident yet.

Similar incidents on the record

Cite this record

SafeLegalAI Global Legal AI Incident Tracker, “Donaghy v. Zoning Bd. of Review of the Town of North Kingstown”, safelegalai.com/tracker/donaghy-v-zoning-bd-of-review-of-the-town-of-north-kingstown (accessed 2026-09-08). Data: CC BY 4.0.

Report an issue with this record →