Skip to content

Incident Tracker / United States (state)

Erica Whitesock v. Bird Global, Inc., and The City of Austin

·District Court of Travis County, Texas, 250th Judicial District·US-STATESanctionsprovisional

On 2026-06-08, in Erica Whitesock v. Bird Global, Inc., and The City of Austin, the Travis County district court granted the City of Austin's jurisdictional plea, dismissed those claims with prejudice, and awarded $10,000 in attorney fees. Counsel filed a response using quotations that did not appear in the cited source, nonexistent or hallucinated authorities, authorities used for propositions.

Court
District Court of Travis County, Texas, 250th Judicial District
Date
2026-06-08
Who used the AI
Lawyer
AI tool
GAI
Conduct
Counsel filed a response using quotations that did not appear in the cited source, nonexistent or hallucinated authorities, authorities used for propositions they did not support, and a nonexistent rule or legal standard.
Outcome
Sanctions
Penalty
US$10,000
Regulatory outcome
No separate regulatory disposition recorded
Status
Provisional — written by the court-decisions pipeline, awaiting the editor
Last checked
2026-09-07

Primary sources for this incident

Related regulation records for this incident

No related regulation record has been linked to this incident yet.

Similar incidents on the record

Cite this record

SafeLegalAI Global Legal AI Incident Tracker, “Erica Whitesock v. Bird Global, Inc., and The City of Austin”, safelegalai.com/tracker/erica-whitesock-v-bird-global-inc-and-the-city-of-austin (accessed 2026-09-08). Data: CC BY 4.0.

Report an issue with this record →