Incident Tracker / United States (state)
Espinoza v. M&R Const. Group Inc.
·Supreme Court of the State of New York·US-STATESanctionsprovisional
On 2026-03-19, Supreme Court of the State of New York scheduled a sanctions hearing after finding that the moving papers relied on a nonexistent Second Department case. Counsel submitted a filing with fabricated or nonexistent authorities, including Parrelli v. Temple Beth El of Great Neck.
- Court
- Supreme Court of the State of New York
- Date
- 2026-03-19
- Who used the AI
- Lawyer
- AI tool
- Not identified in the record
- Conduct
- The filing used fabricated or nonexistent authorities, including Parrelli v. Temple Beth El of Great Neck, which the court found nonexistent, misquoted, or unsupported.
- Outcome
- Sanctions
- Penalty
- No monetary penalty recorded
- Regulatory outcome
- No separate regulatory disposition recorded
- Status
- Provisional — written by the court-decisions pipeline, awaiting the editor
- Last checked
- 2026-09-07
Primary sources for this incident
Related regulation records for this incident
No related regulation record has been linked to this incident yet.
Similar incidents on the record
- LPC Commercial Services, LLC v. Ar-Razzaaq Properties, LLC, Record No. 1407-25-4 (Va. Ct. App.)2026-08-25 · Court of Appeals of Virginia · SanctionsIn Virginia, appellee's counsel in LPC Commercial Services filed a brief with 25 phantom quotations attributed to Virginia cases, which the Court of Appeals attributed to unchecked computer-assisted research. The court…
- In re Stephen Aarons (Supreme Court of New Mexico, murder appeal; case number not located)2026-08-21 · Supreme Court of New Mexico · SanctionsThe Supreme Court of New Mexico held veteran defence lawyer Stephen Aarons in contempt, ordered him to pay USD 5,000 to the client protection fund, removed him from a murder appeal and referred him to the state Discipli…
- Kleyman Law Group, P.C. v. Kaloidis, Index No. 502644/2025 (N.Y. Sup. Ct., Kings County)2026-08-04 · Supreme Court of the State of New York, Kings County · SanctionsIn a fee suit against a client's estate, the Supreme Court of New York, Kings County, found that plaintiff-lawyer Alex Kleyman had cited 23 nonexistent decisions and misrepresented 83 real ones across 19 filings drafted…
- Mendel S. v. Faigy S., 2026 NY Slip Op 26118 (Fam. Ct., Kings County)2026-07-31 · Family Court of the State of New York, Kings County · SanctionsA judge of the Family Court of the State of New York, Kings County, reviewing child-support objections on the court's own motion, found eleven of sixteen citations were AI-generated fictions and the rest miscited. The c…
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Global Legal AI Incident Tracker, “Espinoza v. M&R Const. Group Inc.”, safelegalai.com/tracker/espinoza-v-m-r-const-group-inc (accessed 2026-09-08). Data: CC BY 4.0.