Skip to content

Incident Tracker / United States (state)

In re Marriage of Haddock

·District Court in and for Tulsa County, State of Oklahoma·US-STATERegulatory referralprovisional

On 2026-05-21, in In re the Marriage of Amy Haddock and Justin Blu Haddock, the Tulsa County district court sanctioned counsel $2,000, ordered attorney-fee proceedings, required a knowledge-base audit, and directed bar referral. Counsel filed a motion using authorities used for propositions they did not support.

Court
District Court in and for Tulsa County, State of Oklahoma
Date
2026-05-21
Who used the AI
Lawyer
AI tool
Not identified in the record
Conduct
Husband’s counsel, Mr. Johnson, filed a motion containing three citations to nonexistent law and three citations inaccurately describing case propositions. The court imposed a $2,000 court-fund sanction and contacted the Oklahoma Bar Association.
Outcome
Regulatory referral
Penalty
US$2,000
Regulatory outcome
No separate regulatory disposition recorded
Status
Provisional — written by the court-decisions pipeline, awaiting the editor
Last checked
2026-09-07

Primary sources for this incident

Related regulation records for this incident

No related regulation record has been linked to this incident yet.

Similar incidents on the record

Cite this record

SafeLegalAI Global Legal AI Incident Tracker, “In re Marriage of Haddock”, safelegalai.com/tracker/in-re-the-marriage-of-amy-haddock-and-justin-blu-haddock (accessed 2026-10-07). Data: CC BY 4.0.

Report an issue with this record →