Skip to content

Incident Tracker / United States (state)

In the Interest of W.G.

·Iowa Court of Appeals·US-STATEFiling struckprovisional

On 2026-04-01, Iowa Court of Appeals struck the fabricated-citation portions of the petition on appeal, declined to dismiss the appeal, and considered only arguments untainted by the false authorities. A self-represented party submitted an appellate brief with fabricated or nonexistent authorities and mischaracterized authorities.

Court
Iowa Court of Appeals
Date
2026-04-01
Who used the AI
Litigant in person
AI tool
Perplexity
Conduct
K.M.’s petition on appeal, prepared with the paid version of Perplexity, included at least one nonexistent Iowa appellate decision and multiple propositions not found in cited authorities; she admitted the case was nonexistent and the propositions did not appear.
Outcome
Filing struck
Penalty
No monetary penalty recorded
Regulatory outcome
No separate regulatory disposition recorded
Status
Provisional — written by the court-decisions pipeline, awaiting the editor
Last checked
2026-09-08

Primary sources for this incident

Related regulation records for this incident

No related regulation record has been linked to this incident yet.

Similar incidents on the record

  • Shannon v. Shannon, 322 Neb. 451 (2026), No. S-25-5462026-10-02 · Nebraska Supreme Court · Filing struckIn Nebraska, the state Supreme Court struck a self-represented divorce litigant's appellate brief for fictitious citations produced by his admitted AI use. Extending Prososki v. Regan to unrepresented parties, it held s…
  • Tapscott v. Fariss, No. 25-1666 (Iowa Ct. App. 2026)2026-10-07 · Court of Appeals of Iowa · DismissalIn the Court of Appeals of Iowa, a self-represented appellant's final brief in a protective-order appeal contained multiple hallucinated case citations. After two earlier briefs were struck and the appellant failed to a…
  • Washington v. Justice, No. 2D2025-2678 (Fla. 2d DCA 2026)2026-10-07 · District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District · DismissalIn Florida's Second District Court of Appeal, self-represented appellants filed a brief citing eleven cases the court could not find and likely generated by AI. After an unavailing show-cause response and a pattern of f…
  • R. M. v. Mohr, 353 Or App 182 (2026), A1880922026-09-23 · Oregon Court of Appeals · FineIn Oregon, the Court of Appeals ordered a self-represented restraining-order appellant to pay $250 after his brief cited three fabricated cases he admitted came from AI. The court had threatened $1,500, at $500 per fake…

Cite this record

SafeLegalAI Global Legal AI Incident Tracker, “In the Interest of W.G.”, safelegalai.com/tracker/in-the-interest-of-w-g-minor-child (accessed 2026-10-07). Data: CC BY 4.0.

Report an issue with this record →