Incident Tracker / United States (state)
Kelly Bartholomew v. Public Utility Commission of Oregon
On 2026-04-06, Oregon Court of Appeals dismissed the judicial-review petition after the petitioner failed to explain fabricated AI-sourced citations in her opening brief and show-cause response. A self-represented party submitted a petition with 10 fabricated or nonexistent authorities, including Ass’n v. Washington County, 309 Or App 112, 124-25, 482 P3d 827.
- Court
- Oregon Court of Appeals
- Date
- 2026-04-06
- Who used the AI
- Litigant in person
- AI tool
- Not identified in the record
- Conduct
- The petition used 10 fabricated or nonexistent authorities, including Ass’n v. Washington County, 309 Or App 112, 124-25, 482 P3d 827, which the court found nonexistent, misquoted, or unsupported.
- Outcome
- Dismissal
- Penalty
- No monetary penalty recorded
- Regulatory outcome
- No separate regulatory disposition recorded
- Status
- Provisional — written by the court-decisions pipeline, awaiting the editor
- Last checked
- 2026-09-07
Primary sources for this incident
Related regulation records for this incident
No related regulation record has been linked to this incident yet.
Similar incidents on the record
- State v. Presti, No. CAAP-24-0000826 (Haw. Ct. App.)2026-08-31 · Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · WarningOn a Hawaii criminal appeal, self-represented appellant Cody Presti filed an opening brief citing 95 cases, 11 of which the court could not locate; six citations pointed to unrelated decisions. The Intermediate Court of…
- Noble v. WMC Mortgage Corp., 2026 IL App (1st) 251168-U2026-08-28 · Appellate Court of Illinois, First District · WarningIn Illinois, self-represented litigant Sanja Noble's mortgage appeal brief included a hallucinated citation to Ferguson v. Georges for the standard of review. The Appellate Court found the citation actually led to Peopl…
- Salloum v. Department of Transportation, No. 25CA1748 (Colo. App.)2026-08-27 · Colorado Court of Appeals · WarningIn Colorado, self-represented appellant Ayman Salloum filed an opening brief citing three authorities the Court of Appeals could not verify, including one dated in the future. Applying Al-Hamim's warning on generative-A…
- Varma v. The Bank of New York Mellon, No. E085566 (Cal. Ct. App.)2026-08-27 · California Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District, Division Two · SanctionsThe California Court of Appeal sanctioned self-represented appellants in Varma after their opening brief used nonexistent cases, false quotations and unsupported propositions the court attributed to generative AI hallma…
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Global Legal AI Incident Tracker, “Kelly Bartholomew v. Public Utility Commission of Oregon”, safelegalai.com/tracker/kelly-bartholomew-v-public-utility-commission-of-oregon (accessed 2026-09-08). Data: CC BY 4.0.