Incident Tracker / United States (state)
Landmark Development Group, LLC v. Lonnie LuPardus
·Kansas Court of Appeals·US-STATEFiling struckprovisional
Kansas Court of Appeals on 2026-02-13 in Landmark Development Group, LLC v. Lonnie LuPardus found the self-represented party's expert submission contained three citation defects, including Meadors v. Feltor, Edwards v. Scholtzs and Wilson v. Gutschenritter, involving incorrect statutory or rule text. The court deemed the arguments unsupported or waived because the cited authorities were defective.
- Court
- Kansas Court of Appeals
- Date
- 2026-02-13
- Who used the AI
- Litigant in person
- AI tool
- Not identified in the record
- Conduct
- LuPardus cited Edwards v. Scholtzs, Meadors v. Feltor, and Wilson v. Gutschenritter, none of which existed in Kansas appellate reports, and misread K.S.A. 58-2564 and other authorities to argue the lease obligations ended after eviction.
- Outcome
- Filing struck
- Penalty
- No monetary penalty recorded
- Regulatory outcome
- No separate regulatory disposition recorded
- Status
- Provisional — written by the court-decisions pipeline, awaiting the editor
- Last checked
- 2026-09-07
Primary sources for this incident
Related regulation records for this incident
No related regulation record has been linked to this incident yet.
Similar incidents on the record
- Shannon v. Shannon, 322 Neb. 451 (2026), No. S-25-5462026-10-02 · Nebraska Supreme Court · Filing struckIn Nebraska, the state Supreme Court struck a self-represented divorce litigant's appellate brief for fictitious citations produced by his admitted AI use. Extending Prososki v. Regan to unrepresented parties, it held s…
- Tapscott v. Fariss, No. 25-1666 (Iowa Ct. App. 2026)2026-10-07 · Court of Appeals of Iowa · DismissalIn the Court of Appeals of Iowa, a self-represented appellant's final brief in a protective-order appeal contained multiple hallucinated case citations. After two earlier briefs were struck and the appellant failed to a…
- Washington v. Justice, No. 2D2025-2678 (Fla. 2d DCA 2026)2026-10-07 · District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District · DismissalIn Florida's Second District Court of Appeal, self-represented appellants filed a brief citing eleven cases the court could not find and likely generated by AI. After an unavailing show-cause response and a pattern of f…
- R. M. v. Mohr, 353 Or App 182 (2026), A1880922026-09-23 · Oregon Court of Appeals · FineIn Oregon, the Court of Appeals ordered a self-represented restraining-order appellant to pay $250 after his brief cited three fabricated cases he admitted came from AI. The court had threatened $1,500, at $500 per fake…
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Global Legal AI Incident Tracker, “Landmark Development Group, LLC v. Lonnie LuPardus”, safelegalai.com/tracker/landmark-development-group-llc-v-lonnie-lupardus (accessed 2026-10-07). Data: CC BY 4.0.