Incident Tracker / United States (state)
Witkin v. McGreevy
·Supreme Court of the State of Oregon·US-STATEFineprovisional
On 2026-06-04, in Mary McGreevy v. Adam Witkin, Supreme Court of Oregon struck the response to the petition for review, imposed a $500 sanction, and granted judicial notice. A self-represented appellant filed a response using nonexistent or hallucinated authorities. The monetary component was $500.
- Court
- Supreme Court of the State of Oregon
- Date
- 2026-06-04
- Who used the AI
- Lawyer
- AI tool
- Not identified in the record
- Conduct
- Respondent’s counsel used generative AI to prepare a response to a petition for review and filed fictitious or inaccurate authorities without verification. The court struck the response and imposed a $500 sanction.
- Outcome
- Fine
- Penalty
- US$500
- Regulatory outcome
- No separate regulatory disposition recorded
- Status
- Provisional — written by the court-decisions pipeline, awaiting the editor
- Last checked
- 2026-09-07
Primary sources for this incident
Related regulation records for this incident
No related regulation record has been linked to this incident yet.
Similar incidents on the record
- Capital Standard, LLC v. U.S. Bank National Association, No. 2D2024-1392 (Fla. 2d DCA)2026-08-21 · Florida Second District Court of Appeal · FineFlorida's Second District Court of Appeal affirmed a foreclosure-related declaratory judgment and, in a separate section citing the Charlotin database, fined appellant's counsel USD 1,500, awarded U.S. Bank its appellat…
- Scott v. Illinois Human Rights Commission, 2026 IL App (1st) 2514622026-07-28 · Appellate Court of Illinois, First District · FineThe Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, affirmed dismissal of a Starbucks employee's discrimination charge and sanctioned her lawyer USD 15,000 under Supreme Court Rule 375 for ten AI-hallucinated statutory quo…
- Del Biaggio v. Bansen, No. A174647 (Cal. Ct. App., 1st Dist., Div. 4)2026-07-10 · California Court of Appeal, First Appellate District, Division Four · FineIn a published opinion in an attorney-fee appeal, the California Court of Appeal, First District, fined attorney Floyd USD 1,500 for misstatements and false quotations attributed to the Gorman and PLCM decisions. The ca…
- Nimat Shahid v. Sufyan Esaam (Ga. Ct. App. 2025)2025-06-30 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · FineIn Georgia, the Court of Appeals vacated an order relying on fictitious cases and imposed a $2,500 frivolous-motion penalty on attorney Diana Lynch. It identified eleven fictitious or irrelevant citations in her appella…
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Global Legal AI Incident Tracker, “Witkin v. McGreevy”, safelegalai.com/tracker/mary-mcgreevy-v-adam-witkin (accessed 2026-10-07). Data: CC BY 4.0.