Skip to content

Incident Tracker / United States (state)

Quinteros v. Harbor Distributing, LLC

·California Court of Appeal, First Appellate District, Division Two·US-STATEFineprovisional

On 2026-06-11, in Quinteros v. Harbor Distributing, LLC, the California First District Court of Appeal imposed $6,000 in sanctions payable to the court and referred counsel to the California State Bar. Counsel filed opposition papers using quotations that did not appear in the cited source, multiple nonexistent or hallucinated authorities, and authorities used for propositions they did not support.

Court
California Court of Appeal, First Appellate District, Division Two
Date
2026-06-11
Who used the AI
Lawyer
AI tool
Not identified in the record
Conduct
Lipeles Law Group’s opposition brief contained non-existent citations, at least eight fabricated quotations from five cases, and misrepresentations of controlling authority in opposing a stay. The sanctions order was affirmed.
Outcome
Fine
Penalty
US$6,000
Regulatory outcome
No separate regulatory disposition recorded
Status
Provisional — written by the court-decisions pipeline, awaiting the editor
Last checked
2026-09-08

Primary sources for this incident

Related regulation records for this incident

No related regulation record has been linked to this incident yet.

Similar incidents on the record

  • Capital Standard, LLC v. U.S. Bank National Association, No. 2D2024-1392 (Fla. 2d DCA)2026-08-21 · Florida Second District Court of Appeal · FineFlorida's Second District Court of Appeal affirmed a foreclosure-related declaratory judgment and, in a separate section citing the Charlotin database, fined appellant's counsel USD 1,500, awarded U.S. Bank its appellat…
  • Scott v. Illinois Human Rights Commission, 2026 IL App (1st) 2514622026-07-28 · Appellate Court of Illinois, First District · FineThe Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, affirmed dismissal of a Starbucks employee's discrimination charge and sanctioned her lawyer USD 15,000 under Supreme Court Rule 375 for ten AI-hallucinated statutory quo…
  • Del Biaggio v. Bansen, No. A174647 (Cal. Ct. App., 1st Dist., Div. 4)2026-07-10 · California Court of Appeal, First Appellate District, Division Four · FineIn a published opinion in an attorney-fee appeal, the California Court of Appeal, First District, fined attorney Floyd USD 1,500 for misstatements and false quotations attributed to the Gorman and PLCM decisions. The ca…
  • Nimat Shahid v. Sufyan Esaam (Ga. Ct. App. 2025)2025-06-30 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · FineIn Georgia, the Court of Appeals vacated an order relying on fictitious cases and imposed a $2,500 frivolous-motion penalty on attorney Diana Lynch. It identified eleven fictitious or irrelevant citations in her appella…

Cite this record

SafeLegalAI Global Legal AI Incident Tracker, “Quinteros v. Harbor Distributing, LLC”, safelegalai.com/tracker/quinteros-v-harbor-distributing-llc (accessed 2026-10-07). Data: CC BY 4.0.

Report an issue with this record →