Incident Tracker / United States (state)
Samuel K. v. Winsley Focia
California Court of Appeal on 2026-02-26 in Samuel K. v. Winsley Focia found the self-represented party's opening brief contained three citation defects, including Medical Board v. Superior Court and People v. Panah, involving nonexistent authorities, fabricated or misattributed quotations. The court dismissed the appeal, assessed appellate costs, and addressed the defective authorities.
- Court
- California Court of Appeal
- Date
- 2026-02-26
- Who used the AI
- Litigant in person
- AI tool
- Not identified in the record
- Conduct
- The self-represented party's opening brief contained three citation defects, including Medical Board v. Superior Court and People v. Panah, involving nonexistent authorities, fabricated or misattributed quotations.
- Outcome
- Costs order
- Penalty
- No monetary penalty recorded
- Regulatory outcome
- No separate regulatory disposition recorded
- Status
- Provisional — written by the court-decisions pipeline, awaiting the editor
- Last checked
- 2026-09-07
Primary sources for this incident
Related regulation records for this incident
No related regulation record has been linked to this incident yet.
Similar incidents on the record
- State v. Presti, No. CAAP-24-0000826 (Haw. Ct. App.)2026-08-31 · Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · WarningOn a Hawaii criminal appeal, self-represented appellant Cody Presti filed an opening brief citing 95 cases, 11 of which the court could not locate; six citations pointed to unrelated decisions. The Intermediate Court of…
- Noble v. WMC Mortgage Corp., 2026 IL App (1st) 251168-U2026-08-28 · Appellate Court of Illinois, First District · WarningIn Illinois, self-represented litigant Sanja Noble's mortgage appeal brief included a hallucinated citation to Ferguson v. Georges for the standard of review. The Appellate Court found the citation actually led to Peopl…
- Salloum v. Department of Transportation, No. 25CA1748 (Colo. App.)2026-08-27 · Colorado Court of Appeals · WarningIn Colorado, self-represented appellant Ayman Salloum filed an opening brief citing three authorities the Court of Appeals could not verify, including one dated in the future. Applying Al-Hamim's warning on generative-A…
- Varma v. The Bank of New York Mellon, No. E085566 (Cal. Ct. App.)2026-08-27 · California Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District, Division Two · SanctionsThe California Court of Appeal sanctioned self-represented appellants in Varma after their opening brief used nonexistent cases, false quotations and unsupported propositions the court attributed to generative AI hallma…
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Global Legal AI Incident Tracker, “Samuel K. v. Winsley Focia”, safelegalai.com/tracker/samuel-k-v-winsley-focia (accessed 2026-09-08). Data: CC BY 4.0.