In re termination of parental rights (HK)

What the court wrote

Verbatim from the court's document (public domain). Ellipses mark omitted text; nothing is paraphrased.

on appeal. See Alma S., 245 Ariz. at 151, ¶ 18. Reasonable relying on inappropriate legal authorities). We will forward evidence supports the court's best interests findings. this decision to the State Bar of Arizona to determine whether Mother's counsel violated any rules of professional conduct. IV. Mother's Answering Brief ¶26 Mother's answering brief contains what appear to be CONCLUSION hallucinated quotations from statutes and cases. ¶31 We affirm. ¶27 Mother claims that Section 8-531(1) states that “[a]bandonment is measured by a parent's conduct, not 8-533(B)(1) provides that abandonment is established when the parent has failed to maintain a normal parental relationship

Authorities cited in the passage: a parent · The court concluded these quotes are not in that opinion. || Fabricated: Legal Norm | Mother · [a]bandonment is measured by a parent · s subjective intent · s brief attributed language to A.R.S. § 8-533(B)(1) stating abandonment is established when a parent has failed to maintain a normal parental relationship · The court found the statute does not contain the quoted phrasing. || False Quotes: Case Law | Mother · t of Econ. Sec., 224 Ariz. 373, 378, ¶ 21 (App. 2010) · Mother's brief attributed a non-existent quote to Raymond F. v. Dep't of Econ. Sec