Incident Tracker / United States (state)
In re termination of parental rights (HK)
Arizona Court of Appeals on 2026-02-25 in In re termination of parental rights (HK) found counsel's brief contained four citation defects, including Raymond F. v. Dep't, involving nonexistent authorities, fabricated or misattributed quotations. The court referred counsel to disciplinary authorities for the defective citations.
- Court
- Court of Appeals of Arizona
- Date
- 2026-02-25
- Who used the AI
- Lawyer
- AI tool
- Not identified in the record
- Conduct
- Counsel's brief contained four citation defects, including Raymond F. v. Dep't, involving nonexistent authorities, fabricated or misattributed quotations.
- Outcome
- Regulatory referral
- Penalty
- No monetary penalty recorded
- Regulatory outcome
- No separate regulatory disposition recorded
- Status
- Provisional — written by the court-decisions pipeline, awaiting the editor
- Last checked
- 2026-09-07
Primary sources for this incident
Related regulation records for this incident
No related regulation record has been linked to this incident yet.
Similar incidents on the record
- Douglas v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co., No. 24-CV-1099 (D.C. Ct. App.)2026-09-03 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Regulatory referralIn the District of Columbia Court of Appeals, Deutsche Bank's appellee brief cited four nonexistent authorities after counsel used Google's generative AI search tool without verification. The court struck the brief, ref…
- JMOR Properties, LLC v. Artist Alley Townhomes, LLC, No. 4D2026-1787 (Fla. 4th DCA)2026-08-12 · Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal · Regulatory referralAfter dismissing a certiorari petition that cited a fabricated Fourth District decision, Florida's Fourth District Court of Appeal considered counsel's show-cause response and imposed the sanction of referral to The Flo…
- Kiser v. DeSimone Auto Group, No. 2428 EDA 2025 (Pa. Super. Ct.)2026-08-27 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · WarningIn Pennsylvania, counsel for Paige and Ty Kiser cited a non-existent Superior Court decision, Com. v. Reid, for an appellate issue in a consumer dispute. The Superior Court called the authority counterfeit, suggested ch…
- Benjamin v. State, No. 2189 Sept. Term 2024 (Md. App. Ct.)2026-08-25 · Appellate Court of Maryland · WarningIn Maryland, appellate counsel filed a criminal brief with multiple inaccurate citations. The Appellate Court compared the problem to Mezu, said fake AI-generated cases are improper, accepted counsel's corrective effort…
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Global Legal AI Incident Tracker, “In re termination of parental rights (HK)”, safelegalai.com/tracker/in-re-termination-of-parental-rights-hk (accessed 2026-09-08). Data: CC BY 4.0.