Hussain v. Quraishi

What the court wrote

Verbatim from the court's document (public domain). Ellipses mark omitted text; nothing is paraphrased.

MOHAMED HUSSAIN ET AL. the defendant has statutory right to file the special motion v. to dismiss, the court will consider the defendant's motion to MANSOOR QURAISHI ET AL. dismiss without the AI generated portions of the brief. See order at Docket Entry 123 for a list of the AI generated/ DOCKET NO. TTD-CV25-5019431-S hallucinated portions of the brief. | MARCH 31, 2026 FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE: DEFENDANT'S General Statutes § 52-196a (e)(2) provides: “When ruling on MOTION TO DISMISS (Entry No. 107.00) a special motion to dismiss, the court shall consider pleadings Graff, J. and supporting and opposing affidavits of the parties attesting to the facts upon which liability or a defense, as the case *1 On October 22, 2025, the defendant, Mansoor Quraishi, may be, is based.” The court finds the following facts based filed a special motion to dismiss, with an accompanying on the complaint, dated August 26, 2025, and the affidavits memorandum of law and exhibits. Docket Entry 107. On submitted by both sides. November 26, 2025, the plaintiffs filed an objection to the special motion to dismiss. Docket Entry 114. On December Mohamed Hussain, is the sole member of VCare Family 3, 2025, the plaintiffs filed a supplemental objection to the Practice LLC. Aiholaney Garcia is an employee of VCare special motion to dismiss. Docket Entry 116. Oral argument Family Practice LLC. From August 2016 to February 14, on the special motion to dismiss was held on December 5, 2018, the defendant provided computer/technological support