Incident Tracker / United States (state)
Hussain v. Quraishi
·Superior Court of Connecticut, Judicial District of Tolland at Rockville·US-STATEFiling struckprovisional
On 2026-03-31, Connecticut Superior Court considered the special motion to dismiss without the AI-generated portions and required counsel to explain the use and extent of AI in the brief. Counsel submitted a complaint with multiple false quotations, fabricated or nonexistent authorities and mischaracterized authorities.
- Court
- Superior Court of Connecticut, Judicial District of Tolland at Rockville
- Date
- 2026-03-31
- Who used the AI
- Lawyer
- AI tool
- Not identified in the record
- Conduct
- Attorney Quraishi admitted at the show-cause hearing that he used AI to write the special motion to dismiss; the earlier order identified eight problematic case citations, including nonexistent cases, nonexistent quotes, and wrong citations.
- Outcome
- Filing struck
- Penalty
- No monetary penalty recorded
- Regulatory outcome
- No separate regulatory disposition recorded
- Status
- Provisional — written by the court-decisions pipeline, awaiting the editor
- Last checked
- 2026-09-08
Primary sources for this incident
Related regulation records for this incident
No related regulation record has been linked to this incident yet.
Similar incidents on the record
- Kid International, LLC v. City National Bank of Florida, No. 4D2025-2599 (Fla. 4th DCA 2026)2026-10-07 · District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District · SanctionsIn Florida's Fourth District Court of Appeal, counsel for Kid International filed an AI-assisted brief citing a hallucinated case seven times and fabricated quotations from real authorities. The court affirmed on the me…
- Shannon v. Shannon, 322 Neb. 451 (2026), No. S-25-5462026-10-02 · Nebraska Supreme Court · Filing struckIn Nebraska, the state Supreme Court struck a self-represented divorce litigant's appellate brief for fictitious citations produced by his admitted AI use. Extending Prososki v. Regan to unrepresented parties, it held s…
- Cervantes v. Bianco, No. S295866 (Cal. Sept. 24, 2026)2026-09-24 · Supreme Court of California · Regulatory referralIn California, the state Supreme Court disapproved the improper use of AI tools in the Riverside County sheriff's briefing in a ballot-seizure writ case, after the law firm misquoted Common Cause v. Board of Supervisors…
- Lisandrillo v. Palozzi, No. 4D2026-2262 (Fla. 4th DCA)2026-09-16 · District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District · PendingIn Florida's Fourth District Court of Appeal, petitioner's counsel Jaclyn R. Soroka filed an emergency writ petition and related filings the court suspected contained AI-generated components, including convoluted false…
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Global Legal AI Incident Tracker, “Hussain v. Quraishi”, safelegalai.com/tracker/mohamed-hussain-et-al-v-mansoor-quraishi-et-al (accessed 2026-10-07). Data: CC BY 4.0.