In re Marriage of Nelson and Derry

What the court wrote

Verbatim from the court's document (public domain). Ellipses mark omitted text; nothing is paraphrased.

, 783 F. Supp. 3d 959, 960 (N. D. Tex. 2025) (“It is no secret that generative [artificial intelligence (AI)] programs are known to ‘hallucinate’ nonexistent cases, and with the advent of AI, courts have seen a rash of cases in which both counsel and pro se litigants have cited such fake, hallucinated cases in their briefs. ” (quoting Sanders v. United States, 176 Fed. Cl. 163, 168-69 (2025))). 4 The Mathews factors require us to consider: First, the private interest that will be affected by the official action; second, the risk of an erroneous deprivation of such interest through the procedures used, and the probable value, if any, of additional or substitute procedural safeguards; and finally, the Government's interest, including the function involved and the fiscal and administrative burdens that the additional or substitute procedural requirement would entail.

Authorities cited in the passage: Sanders v. United States, 176 Fed · Husband cited 'DeMars v. DeMars, 590 N.W.2d 116, 120-21 (Minn. Ct. App. 1999)', which the court was unable to loc