Fofanah v. Rockwall Rental Properties

What the court wrote

Verbatim from the court's document (public domain). Ellipses mark omitted text; nothing is paraphrased.

After appellee filed its brief, cogently and logically demonstrating the lack of merit in appellants’ appellate argument and showing that the case citations briefed by appellants do not stand for the claimed propositions of law, appellants filed a replybrief. Thereplybriefattemptedtoaddanappellateissue,anditincludedfifteen opinion citations. Of those, one is a purported opinion from this court for which the citation is incorrect and which we were unable to locate after extensive research. It appears to be hallucinated. Four of the opinions cited in the reply brief do not stand for the asserted propositions. The remaining cases cited are for generic legal propositions, such as the standards for granting summary judgment. Considering the merits, we find no error and affirm the judgment. BACKGROUND On January 14, 2020, appellants executed a promissory note in favor of appellee, secured by a deed of trust against their property in Kaufman County.

Authorities cited in the passage: Appellants relied on Khan v. GBAK Properties, Inc. for a notice-of-default proposition the opinion does not support · Appellants cited 'Jones v. American Real Estate Services, LLC' as an opinion of this court