Skip to content

Courts on AI / Fabricated or misquoted citations

Ascent Management, Inc. et al v. Shell Oil Company et al

Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County, Ohio · State trial courts · OH · · No. 2024 CV 03112 JUDGE STEVEN K. DANKOF · order

The Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County, Ohio on 2026-04-30 awarded $5,237 against the filing party for expenses caused by fabricated or misrepresented authorities in Ascent Management, Inc. et al v. Shell Oil Company et al. Counsel filed a submission with one fabricated case citation and three mischaracterized case citations, including Perrico v. Verizon.

Disposition
The court awarded $5,237 against the filing party for expenses caused by fabricated or misrepresented authorities.
Recorded conduct
Counsel filed a submission with one fabricated case citation and three mischaracterized case citations, including Perrico v. Verizon and Kyser v. Summit County Children Services. — outcome: costs order; actor: lawyer; $5,237
Canonical record
Incident tracker entry — verified outcome, regulator disposition and related rules

What the court wrote

Verbatim from the court's document (public domain). Ellipses mark omitted text; nothing is paraphrased.

), quoting Black's Law Dictionary, 1103 (6 Ed. 1991). ensure that they support the proposition they are representing. 19 It goes without saying that submitting fake or materially misleading citations means that the attorney failed to read and verify the cases. R. C. 2323. 51(A)(2) defines “frivolous conduct” as: Conduct of … other party to a civil action… that satisfies any of the following: (i) It obviously serves merely to harass or maliciously injure another party to the civil action or appeal or is for another improper purpose, including, but not limited to, causing unnecessary delay or a needless increase in the cost of litigation. (ii) It is not warranted under existing law, cannot be supported by a good faith argument for an extension, modification, or reversal of existing law, or cannot be supported by a good faith argument for the establishment of new law.

Authorities cited in the passage: Perrico v. Verizon, 2018-Ohio-3994.' Court found no such opinion on search and treated it as a fabri · Kyser v. Summit County Children Services, 2022-Ohio-1207,' but court's search showed the reporter corresponds to a differe · Citation to 'Baker v. Coast to Coast Manpower, LLC, 2020-Ohio-4533' corresponded to a different published decision on search

compiled by the Cognesio LLP editorial teammethodas of 2026-09-07v0.1.1coding CC BY 4.0JSON Hugging Face GitHub