Skip to content

Courts on AI / Fabricated or misquoted citations

Superb Motors Inc. v. Anthony Deo

United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York · Federal district courts · NY · · No. 23-CV-6188 (JMW) · order

The Eastern District of New York on 2026-04-30 ordered counsel to pay $1,500 for filing unverified or fabricated authorities in Superb Motors Inc. et al. v. Anthony Deo et al. Counsel filed a submission with two fabricated case citations, including In re Marcus, 491 F.2d 56, 60 (2nd Cir. 1974).

Disposition
The court imposed a $1,500 sanction payable into the court registry and declined to refer the matter to the grievance committee.
Recorded conduct
Attorney Harry Thomasson, appearing pro se, filed an opposition with two fake citations, In re Amica and In re Marcus, generated by or consistent with generative AI. The court imposed a $1,500 court-registry sanction. — outcome: fine; actor: lawyer; $1,500
Canonical record
Incident tracker entry — verified outcome, regulator disposition and related rules

What the court wrote

Verbatim from the court's document (public domain). Ellipses mark omitted text; nothing is paraphrased.

...Ste Box 112 Wantagh, NY 11793 Defendant Appearing Pro Se No appearances by other Parties WICKS, Magistrate Judge: While this case has had its fair share of discovery disputes and countless motion practice, the Court is now confronted with an issue that attorneys should never want to be a part of: the use of generative artificial intelligence (“AI”) to assist in the drafting of legal papers that results in the creation of a legal submission containing citations to fictitious or non-existent legal authority – commonly referred to as “hallucinated” or fake case citations. In a brief filed in opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion to Vacate the Preliminary Injunction (ECF No. 353), pro se Defendant Harry R. Thomasson, Esq. (“Thomasson”) relied upon AI-generated content that created fictitious legal citations. Tha...

Authorities cited in the passage: United States v. Cohen, 724 F · Cartagena v. Dixon, No. 25-CV- 03552 (JLR · Kaur v. Desso, No. 25-CV-726 (AMN · Fed. R. Civ. P. 11

compiled by the SafeLegalAI editorial teammethodas of 2026-09-08v0.2.2coding CC BY 4.0JSON Hugging Face GitHub