Yanling Zhang v. Yanhui Zhang

What the court wrote

Verbatim from the court's document (public domain). Ellipses mark omitted text; nothing is paraphrased.

BROWN EME COURT IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA YANLING ZHANG, Appellant, vs. YANHUI ZHANG, Respondent. ORDER IMPOSING SANCTIONS, REFERRING COUNSEL TO THE STATE BAR FOR INVESTIGATION, AND DENYING REQUEST TO CORRECT OPENING BRIEF On March 23, 2026, we entered an order toshow cause why this court should not impose sanctions or refer attorney Michael Lin to the State Bar of Nevada for investigation for potential violations of the Nevada Rules ofAppellate Procedure and Rulesof Professional Responsibility, specifically his inclusion of fictional or misleading citations in his opening brief. In response to this order, Mr. Lin acknowledges the seriousness of the circumstances and requests to file a corrected opening brief. Having considered Mr.

Authorities cited in the passage: Appellant cited City of Henderson v. Bldg. & Constr. Trades Council, but the Court's research indicates this citation is fictional · Appellant cited Blakeney v. State, but the Court's research indicates this citation is fictional · Inc. v. Precision Constr., Inc · Appellant cited Coyote Springs Inv. v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Ct