Incident Tracker / United States (state)
Zhang v. Zhang
The Supreme Court of Nevada on 2026-04-22 fined counsel $250, referred counsel to the State Bar, and denied leave to file a corrected opening brief in Yanling Zhang v. Yanhui Zhang. Counsel filed an opening brief with two fabricated case citations and two mischaracterized case citations, including City of Henderson v. Bldg. & Constr. Trades Council.
- Court
- Supreme Court of Nevada
- Date
- 2026-04-22
- Who used the AI
- Lawyer
- AI tool
- Not identified in the record
- Conduct
- Attorney Michael Lin included fictional or misleading citations in the opening brief and acknowledged the seriousness of the conduct in response to the show-cause order.
- Outcome
- Regulatory referral
- Penalty
- US$250
- Regulatory outcome
- No separate regulatory disposition recorded
- Status
- Provisional — written by the court-decisions pipeline, awaiting the editor
- Last checked
- 2026-09-07
Primary sources for this incident
Related regulation records for this incident
No related regulation record has been linked to this incident yet.
Similar incidents on the record
- Cervantes v. Bianco, No. S295866 (Cal. Sept. 24, 2026)2026-09-24 · Supreme Court of California · Regulatory referralIn California, the state Supreme Court disapproved the improper use of AI tools in the Riverside County sheriff's briefing in a ballot-seizure writ case, after the law firm misquoted Common Cause v. Board of Supervisors…
- Douglas v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co., No. 24-CV-1099 (D.C. Ct. App.)2026-09-03 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Regulatory referralIn the District of Columbia Court of Appeals, Deutsche Bank's appellee brief cited four nonexistent authorities after counsel used Google's generative AI search tool without verification. The court struck the brief, ref…
- JMOR Properties, LLC v. Artist Alley Townhomes, LLC, No. 4D2026-1787 (Fla. 4th DCA)2026-08-12 · Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal · Regulatory referralAfter dismissing a certiorari petition that cited a fabricated Fourth District decision, Florida's Fourth District Court of Appeal considered counsel's show-cause response and imposed the sanction of referral to The Flo…
- Kid International, LLC v. City National Bank of Florida, No. 4D2025-2599 (Fla. 4th DCA 2026)2026-10-07 · District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District · SanctionsIn Florida's Fourth District Court of Appeal, counsel for Kid International filed an AI-assisted brief citing a hallucinated case seven times and fabricated quotations from real authorities. The court affirmed on the me…
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Global Legal AI Incident Tracker, “Zhang v. Zhang”, safelegalai.com/tracker/yanling-zhang-v-yanhui-zhang (accessed 2026-10-07). Data: CC BY 4.0.