Henri Giovani Morales Jimenez v. Christopher Shanahan

What the court wrote

Verbatim from the court's document (public domain). Ellipses mark omitted text; nothing is paraphrased.

And she relied on an abrogated Supreme Court case and at least one nonexistent case. It was always going to be difficult for petitioner to prevail, but at least he would've had the benefit of liberal construction had he proceeded pro HENRI GIOVANI MORALES JIMENEZ, Petitioner, v...., Slip Copy (2026) se.Individualsinpetitioner'spositionneedzealousadvocates, not“cut-and-pastelawyering.”TubaPullav.Lyons,No.1:26- cv-2682, 2026 WL 906251, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 1, 2026). CONCLUSION *4 For the reasons set forth above, the habeas petition is denied. SO ORDERED. Dated: Brooklyn, New York May 12, 2026 All Citations Slip Copy, 2026 WL 1309291 Footnotes 1 Petitioner also argues, in only conclusory terms, that his detention violates the Trafficking Victims Protection Act (“TVPA”) and the “Flores Settlement.” The TVPA has no bearing on the lawfulness of petitioner's detention, as the relevant portions apply only to individuals under the age of 18, and petitioner was 35 when last taken into custody. See 8 U.S.C.