Skip to content

Incident Tracker / United States (federal)

Henri Giovani Morales Jimenez v. Christopher Shanahan

·United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York·US-FEDNoted, no consequenceprovisional

On 2026-05-13, in Henri Giovani Morales Jimenez v. Christopher Shanahan, the Eastern District of New York denied habeas relief and admonished counsel for briefing that relied on an abrogated decision and a nonexistent case. Counsel filed a petition using unsupported or inaccurate legal authorities.

Court
United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Date
2026-05-13
Who used the AI
Lawyer
AI tool
Not identified in the record
Conduct
Counsel relied on abrogated authority and at least one nonexistent case in a habeas filing. The court denied relief and imposed no citation-related sanction.
Outcome
Noted, no consequence
Penalty
No monetary penalty recorded
Regulatory outcome
No separate regulatory disposition recorded
Status
Provisional — written by the court-decisions pipeline, awaiting the editor
Last checked
2026-09-08

Primary sources for this incident

Related regulation records for this incident

No related regulation record has been linked to this incident yet.

Similar incidents on the record

Cite this record

SafeLegalAI Global Legal AI Incident Tracker, “Henri Giovani Morales Jimenez v. Christopher Shanahan”, safelegalai.com/tracker/henri-giovani-morales-jimenez-v-christopher-shanahan (accessed 2026-10-07). Data: CC BY 4.0.

Report an issue with this record →