Courts on AI / Fabricated or misquoted citations
Vargas v. MTA Bus Co.
Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County · State trial courts · NY · · 2026 WL 1811875 · No. 150611/2019 · order
On 2026-06-12, in Vargas v. MTA Bus Co, Supreme Court of New York amended its prior order and declined to attribute the non-existent citations in duplicated opposition papers to appellate counsel. Counsel filed opposition papers using nonexistent or hallucinated authorities.
- Disposition
- The court amended a prior order to deny summary judgment without prejudice in Paez Rodriguez and directed separate motion practice; it did not sanction anyone for the prior non-existent citations.
- Recorded conduct
- Paez Rodriguez’s opposition papers contained citations to non-existent cases, but the proposition of law was true. The court expressly did not attribute the citations to appellate counsel and imposed no consequence. — outcome: noted, no consequence; actor: lawyer
- Canonical record
- Incident tracker entry — verified outcome, regulator disposition and related rules
What the court wrote
Verbatim from the court's document (public domain). Ellipses mark omitted text; nothing is paraphrased.
The prior decision and order acknowledged the non-existent cases, but the proposition of law in those non-existent citations was, in fact, true. As the filing of identical motion papers in Paez Rodriguez is intended to cure a mistaken belief that “consolidated motion practice” was permissible, this court will not attribute the non-existent citations to appellate counsel for Paez Rodriguez.