Incident Tracker / United States (state)
Vargas v. MTA Bus Co.
·Supreme Court of New York·US-STATEOtherprovisional
On 2026-06-12, in Vargas v. MTA Bus Co, Supreme Court of New York amended its prior order and declined to attribute the non-existent citations in duplicated opposition papers to appellate counsel. Counsel filed opposition papers using nonexistent or hallucinated authorities.
- Court
- Supreme Court of New York
- Date
- 2026-06-12
- Who used the AI
- Lawyer
- AI tool
- GAI
- Conduct
- Counsel filed opposition papers using nonexistent or hallucinated authorities.
- Outcome
- Other
- Penalty
- No monetary penalty recorded
- Regulatory outcome
- No separate regulatory disposition recorded
- Status
- Provisional — written by the court-decisions pipeline, awaiting the editor
- Last checked
- 2026-09-07
Primary sources for this incident
Related regulation records for this incident
No related regulation record has been linked to this incident yet.
Similar incidents on the record
- Matter of Samuel, 2024 NY Slip Op 24014, 82 Misc 3d 616 (Sur Ct, Kings County 2024)2024-01-11 · New York Surrogate's Court, Kings County · OtherIn the Kings County Surrogate's Court, Surrogate Bernard J. Graham found that counsel for objectant Leopold Osborne filed reply papers in which five of six cited cases were erroneous or nonexistent, apparently from gene…
- Ex parte Allen Michael Lee, No. 10-22-00281-CR (Tex. App.—Waco July 19, 2023) (published)2023-07-19 · Texas Court of Appeals, Tenth District (Waco) · OtherIn the Tenth Court of Appeals of Texas, Chief Justice Tom Gray held that appellant Lee's brief cited three published cases that do not exist, noted the Argument section may have been AI-prepared, and overruled the issue…
- Douglas v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co., No. 24-CV-1099 (D.C. Ct. App.)2026-09-03 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Regulatory referralIn the District of Columbia Court of Appeals, Deutsche Bank's appellee brief cited four nonexistent authorities after counsel used Google's generative AI search tool without verification. The court struck the brief, ref…
- Kiser v. DeSimone Auto Group, No. 2428 EDA 2025 (Pa. Super. Ct.)2026-08-27 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · WarningIn Pennsylvania, counsel for Paige and Ty Kiser cited a non-existent Superior Court decision, Com. v. Reid, for an appellate issue in a consumer dispute. The Superior Court called the authority counterfeit, suggested ch…
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Global Legal AI Incident Tracker, “Vargas v. MTA Bus Co.”, safelegalai.com/tracker/vargas-v-mta-bus-co (accessed 2026-09-08). Data: CC BY 4.0.