Skip to content

Courts on AI / Fabricated or misquoted citations

Shaun Fleck v. Del-One Federal Credit Union

U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon · Federal district courts · OR · · No. 3:25-cv-01048-SB · opinion

On 2026-03-30, U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon ordered screening conditions and warned that any further hallucinated legal citations would expose the plaintiff to sanctions or dismissal. A self-represented party submitted an appellate brief with The appellate brief attributed a quotation to a non-existent case and relied on that authority for a proposition not supported by real law.

Disposition
The court ordered screening conditions and warned that any further hallucinated legal citations would expose the plaintiff to sanctions or dismissal.
Recorded conduct
The appellate brief attributed a quotation to a non-existent case and relied on that authority for a proposition not supported by real law. — outcome: warning; actor: litigant in person
Canonical record
Incident tracker entry — verified outcome, regulator disposition and related rules

What the court wrote

Verbatim from the court's document (public domain). Ellipses mark omitted text; nothing is paraphrased.

case” and the only source on Westlaw that includes the quote that Fleck attributes to the non-existent case is Fleck’s response in this case. Cf. Whiting v. City of Athens, No. 24-5918, --- F.4th ---- , 2026 WL 710568, at *1, *3, *10-13 (6th Cir. Mar. 13, 2026) (sanctioning lawyers for submitting briefing that “cited non-existent cases[] and cited cases for propositions of law that they did not even discuss, much less support,” explaining that the “appeal [was] frivolous as argued because [the lawyers] submitted fake cases, and inventing case law is a misrepresentation of law,” and providing examples that the Sixth Circuit was unable to locate, citations that did “not generate a case,” and an instance in which the “only source on Westlaw” was a lawyer’s “briefing in th[e] case”). It is also important to consider “when AI is used to prepare a brief, ‘AI hallucinations are more likely to occur when there are little to no existing authorities available that clearly satisfy the user’s request—such as, for example, when a [litigant] asks a generative AI tool to supply a citation for an unsupported principle of law.’” Id. at

compiled by the Cognesio LLP editorial teammethodas of 2026-09-07v0.1.1coding CC BY 4.0JSON Hugging Face GitHub