Courts on AI / Fabricated or misquoted citations
Beedemariam Kassaw v. Wal-Mart Corporation
U.S. District Court for the Western District of New York · Federal district courts · NY · · No. 1619 · order
On 2026-03-30, U.S. District Court for the Western District of New York struck the January 2026 filings and ordered the plaintiff to submit any future request to file additional papers as a motion. A self-represented party submitted a filing with fabricated or nonexistent authorities.
- Disposition
- The court struck the January 2026 filings and ordered the plaintiff to submit any future request to file additional papers as a motion.
- Recorded conduct
- The filing used fabricated or nonexistent authorities that the court found nonexistent, misquoted, or unsupported for the propositions asserted. — outcome: strike off; actor: litigant in person
- Canonical record
- Incident tracker entry — verified outcome, regulator disposition and related rules
What the court wrote
Verbatim from the court's document (public domain). Ellipses mark omitted text; nothing is paraphrased.
Under the policy, each instance of employee misconduct is assigned a level of accountability, up to and including termination, based on the severity of the conduct and/or where the employee is in the progressive discipline process. (Id.). The first level of accountability is a yellow disciplinary action (“DA1-Yellow”), followed by an orange disciplinary action (“DA2- Orange”), and the final level of accountability before termination is a red disciplinary action (“DA3-Red”). (Id. at ¶ 23). The policy provides that an employee “may receive only one of each level of disciplinary action in any 12-month period” and “levels may be skipped based on the circumstances.” (Id. at ¶ 24). If an employee achieves a DA3-Red and an additional instance of misconduct warranting disciplinary action occurs, the next level of accountability is termination. (Id. at ¶ 25; see also Dkt. 54-3 at ¶¶ 18-24). Plaintiff was aware of this policy. (Dkt. 54-1 at ¶ 26). In the seven months leading up to his termination, Plaintiff achieved the highest- level disciplinary action. (Id. at ¶ 29). On March 7, 2020, assistant manager David Shepard gave Plaintiff a DA1-Yellow, for excessive meal violations over a