Skip to content

Incident Tracker / United States (federal)

Beedemariam Kassaw v. Wal-Mart Corporation

·U.S. District Court for the Western District of New York·US-FEDStrike-off / disbarmentprovisional

On 2026-03-30, U.S. District Court for the Western District of New York struck the January 2026 filings and ordered the plaintiff to submit any future request to file additional papers as a motion. A self-represented party submitted a filing with fabricated or nonexistent authorities.

Court
U.S. District Court for the Western District of New York
Date
2026-03-30
Who used the AI
Litigant in person
AI tool
Not identified in the record
Conduct
The filing used fabricated or nonexistent authorities that the court found nonexistent, misquoted, or unsupported for the propositions asserted.
Outcome
Strike-off / disbarment
Penalty
No monetary penalty recorded
Regulatory outcome
No separate regulatory disposition recorded
Status
Provisional — written by the court-decisions pipeline, awaiting the editor
Last checked
2026-09-07

Primary sources for this incident

Related regulation records for this incident

No related regulation record has been linked to this incident yet.

Similar incidents on the record

  • Ashmeade v. Amazon.com Services LLC, No. 7:23-cv-04331-KMK-VR (S.D.N.Y.)2026-08-27 · US District Court, Southern District of New York · WarningIn the Southern District of New York, self-represented plaintiff Keith Ashmeade cited two nonexistent Southern District decisions while litigating discovery issues against Amazon. Magistrate Judge Reznik identified the…
  • Johnson v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC, No. 1:25-cv-00855-JRR (D. Md.)2026-08-26 · US District Court, District of Maryland · WarningIn the District of Maryland, self-represented plaintiff Darrin Johnson again cited a case the court could not locate, after an earlier Rule 11 warning. Judge Rubin said the authority appeared to be hallucinated from gen…
  • Potterf v. Wessels, No. 1:26-cv-10860-MFL-PTM (E.D. Mich.)2026-08-26 · US District Court, Eastern District of Michigan · WarningIn the Eastern District of Michigan, self-represented plaintiffs admitted using artificial intelligence to draft objections with fictitious or erroneous citations and an invented Supreme Court quotation. Judge Leitman d…
  • Turgeon v. FHLMC, No. 1:25-cv-00510-SM-TSM (D.N.H.)2026-08-26 · US District Court, District of New Hampshire · OtherIn the District of New Hampshire, self-represented debtor Noella Turgeon appealed a bankruptcy order that struck her objection after false, hallucinated citations. Judge McAuliffe held the bankruptcy court acted within…

Cite this record

SafeLegalAI Global Legal AI Incident Tracker, “Beedemariam Kassaw v. Wal-Mart Corporation”, safelegalai.com/tracker/beedemariam-kassaw-v-wal-mart-corporation (accessed 2026-09-08). Data: CC BY 4.0.

Report an issue with this record →